RailForge logo

Failure analysis

Case Studies in What Went Wrong

Every one of these is a post-mortem, not a glamour shot. A real HO scale failure — a train that stringlined, a turnout that arced, a car that climbed the rail — traced from the symptom you see to the physics underneath to the fix that actually holds. The point is to reason about the layout as a system, so you can diagnose your own failures instead of guessing.

Each study links the Lab tool that puts a number on the problem and the glossary terms that name the forces at work.

Read: The Consist That Stringlined on a Curve Forces & traction

The Consist That Stringlined on a Curve

A long train pulled its mid-cars straight off the inside of a curve. Here is why lateral coupler force — not the grade alone — lifted them off the rail.

Read the post-mortem
Read: The Turnout That Arced and Stalled Locos DCC & electrical

The Turnout That Arced and Stalled Locos

A metal-frog turnout threw sparks and stalled short-wheelbase locos. The root cause was a frog powered against the point setting — a dead short waiting for a wheel.

Read the post-mortem
Read: The Car That Climbed the Rail on a Tight Curve Wheels & track

The Car That Climbed the Rail on a Tight Curve

A long passenger car picked the outer rail and climbed off on an 18-inch curve. Nadal’s limit and the car’s overhang explain exactly why.

Read the post-mortem
Put a number on it

From post-mortem to prevention

Each failure here is something the Lab calculators help you avoid up front — grade and pull, clearance, radius, wiring. Reach for them before the next build, not after the derailment.

Open the Lab →

Name the forces

The terms behind the failures

Stringlining, Nadal’s limit, overhang, power routing — the glossary derives each one from the physics, so the case studies read as diagnosis rather than jargon.

Read the glossary →